This is a letter sent to the Regional Director of the Insolvency Service.
The corruption outlined here is the 18th entry in the series making, as they do, a picture from interlocking pieces.
The public interest is in asking how many victims of such corruption have there been?
It also begs certain questions which any reasonable minded person would ask. Feel free to do so.
Links will be shown at the base of the this Open Letter.
Total transparency is needed.
The letter was sent from my home address in Lancaster.
I supplied an email address for contact in the first instance given the mail interception (link to Royal Mail and Lancaster sorting Office to be published) I have suffered for over 3 years now.
Recorded delivery to Mr R Evison Regional Director Insolvency Service
6th Floor
Boulton House
17 - 21 Chorlton St
Manchester M 1 3HY Thomson refuses to offer me the fax number.
Dear Sir
Re: IAN THOMSON OFFICIAL RECEIVER BLACKPOOL. FRAUD
I have been intending to write to you but another has been dealing with my letters sent via the Insolvency Service saying that she had been asked to do that. She suddenly stopped writing to me when I found something out I was not supposed to have found out. She, Shona Manson was a liar. Fortunately I have all the cogent evidence.
I have written to the DTI on Victoria St in London and visisted them.
I have sent their fraud department emails asking that I be allowed to make a statement with regard to the corruption of Thomson.
My complaint is this - the Fraud apparent and documented has not been dealt with in any way. It is still ignored.
Briefly, (Thomson knew of all this and said he would have to act on the crimes committed under his obligations as per the Code of Conduct for Civil Servants. He told me that when he thought he was writing to someone else. He indicated to me, when I told him he had actually written to me in another name and reminded him of his duties and legal obligations {Sec 4(1) Criminal Law Act 1968 Aiding and abetting} that he could discriminate against me if he felt so inclined).
Thomson said that there was a bankruptcy order made against me with Lancashire County Council as Creditors. The DTI confirmed the law on that, which I knew in any event, whilst LCC is a public body they have no corporate personality and cannot bankrupt anybody.
Their documents, as usual, are rubbish. But the fact that they were sworn by a LAURA SALES and an IAN FISHER who declared that I owed monies that I did not owe is perjury as well as fraud.
What I now know was that there had been a 'bankruptcy' on 24 March 06. But as it was seen that I knew nothing about it they had to change the plans. Except that Thomson prepared the usual documents for issue. He could do nothing though at that time. There was another 'hearing' on 29th June 06 where I presented my claim for fraud but noted that there were no documents in court, documents which I had previously submitted for the FRAUD claim.
I now can show that they had been destroyed. Thomson was party to that. That destruction was a criminal offence. I also knew that not only could LCC not bankrupt me or anybody else but that the judge hearing the claim did not have jurisdiction to hear any claim with so much money involved. Thomson knew all that as well.
Even if all that had been legal (my documents showed that there were no County Court judgements against me even after the date of the 'petition' and even after the date of the 'bankruptcy') a county court cannot hear a claim where the Creditor is a government department; the case has to be remitted to the High Court. Moreover, the law dictated that where such an amount of money was involved that the case be remitted to the High Court.
My claim of fraud dictated that the case be automatically transferred to the High Court.
The fact that a government department was involved (illegally but nevertheless involved) dictated by law that the claim be remitted to the High Court. I pointed all that out in court to a most ignorant judge who indicated that she need not bother with the law, actually she didn't know the law being only newly appointed deputy district judge. I also informed the person who told me that she had been asked to deal with my complaint of that. That was when the conspiracy was seen and yet another cover up began.
There was no court order after 29 June 06 and it was only after I continued to ask for one that one was manufactured. Thomson himself knew that there was no order because that much is admitted. He admitted that everything had been done on a phone call. All that is in writing.
Thomson knew that I could prove that the documents sent to me from him on the strength of a phone call could be seen to have been prepared in advance.
Thomson pretended to me initially when I complained to the Secretariat that he was not the Official Receiver. He led me to believe that he was dealing with my questions while based in London. The Secretariat then stepped in briefly.
I also have two pages that show, in fact that I bankrupted myself. Naturally no one can supply me with any petition signed by me for any bankruptcy at any time. I have never signed anything. And I have never paid to petition any court for bankruptcy. Why would I? My credit rating was always 100%. There is also a history of their corruption during the time I tried to apply for an annulment Order. I tried but was prevented by Thomson's associates. Thomson has close non-professional associations with Fisher and others from LCC and in Lancaster County Court. Naturally all that has cogent evidence to discharge the burden of proof. That issue itself is extra to this outline.
I faxed Thomson pages showing the corruption on a number of occasions. He did not respond. The threats I have received via email from another associate of Thomson's have strangely been deleted from my emails and I haven't deleted them. However, I have copies of them. Thomson's links with Lancashire Police via Ian Fisher are well known.
You will agree that this is public interest. Thomson will have acted on other persons possibly less able to deal with matters themselves. The same corrupt cartel has been involved for years and never before challenged.
I have delayed this complaint to you because, as I explained to the one lying about her selection to manage the complaint, that I know that managers cover for corruption from employees. I offer you as cogent evidence of that 11 pages. The person, PATRICIA ALLEN works with a false CV and makes claims in High Courts Family Division that she has an Hons degree that she does not have (being semi-literate) and one that has never existed. The point of that is that she is a 'companion' to her managers in LCC who are associates of Thomson's and they will do nothing except to protect her, bully, liar and perjurer that she is. She was a domestic in a children's home and put lives at risk managing to kill at least two. She was my manager when I blew the whistle and why she is protected. I know from experience that managers protect their criminal staff contrary to statute and common law.
Thomson was copied the law on FRAUD and Lord Denning's quote with Case Law and the common law of Misconduct in Public Office (including Misfeasance) among other statutes.
For you to investigate this complaint I will expect to be asked to make a formal statement (which I have asked to be allowed to do for many months now to the liar pretending she had been allocated the complaint) and then to see what documents Thomson delivers up before I deliver up mine.
Internet entry referred to: http://www.criticalreader2006.blogspot.com/ Links if you are interested, telling the story and naming the corrupt cartel members.
I will also record that Thomson in conspiracy with others stole my sick benefits knowing that that was my only income. He still refuses to allow me to have it via three more of his associates. Two of whom, I believe, have had relations which accounts for the willing participation in the corruption.
I would prefer to send this via fax for security reasons but cannot because I am deprived of your fax number. I am unable to send this at the moment and will rely on another to be available when a post office is open to have it sent recorded delivery. The sending date may be a little out of kilter with the date of this letter.
Also, I am deprived of mail (by John Butler in my local Sorting Office associate of Thomson's). They have ceased bothering to open the mail before I am allowed to have it, they just steal it now. I am missing about 6 letters this week alone. I am also aware of gate keeping by secretaries where they do not allow the intended recipient to receive their mail but reply in the name of the intended recipient. And I have cogent evidence of that as well, all relevant to this matter. That is one reason I have put my email address for contact, I will be able to verify the sender of comunications on this ugly business.
"No judgement of a court, no order of a Minister, can be allowed to stand if it has been obtained by fraud. Fraud unravels everything.... once it is proved it vitiates judgements, contracts and all transactions whatsoever..." Lord Denning: Lazarus Estate v Beasley 1956 Other case laws if necessary. The proof is available and public interest. I not need or want, incidentally, a lecture on courts and judges. Corruption is rife, ignorant judges abound, the rule of law is threatened by outside interferences. I know the law. I also know the rules and procedures of bankruptcy. And this is led by Thomson and his associates in Lancashire CC. It was hoped that I would not know the law and procedures. Definition of FRAUD, Black's: "An intentional perversion of the truth for the purpose of inducing another in reliance on it topart with some valuable thing belonging to him or to surrender a legal right. A false representation as to a matter of fact, whether by words or conduct... " etc. Thomson has a clsoe associate who was to take my house from me at a knock down price. And that can be proved. Their probelms arose when it was learned that I didn't own my house and when I discovered that LCC staff (Ian Young, another associate of Thomson's) had been forging my signature and that of others. And probably for at least two years. Certainly in the 'bankruptcy' which fact Thomson knew. Thomson was copied all the relevant laws. I cannot be copied relevant data.
This is on the Internet, public interest is apparent (this blog here)
Yours faithfully
Carol Woods
Encl 11 pages Patricia Allen perjurer who conspired to pervert the course of justice with LCC legal team for baby LF. Also works with false CV. Examples of managers covering for corrupt staff.
1 page showing I tried to purse a private prosecution against Thomson under all the correct and relevant legislation but was prevented by Thomsons' corrupt associates in Blackpool Magistrates Court. That time is well documented.
CC
